‘To be rooted’, wrote French philosopher Simone Weil in The Need for Roots, ‘is perhaps the most important and least recognized need of the human soul’ (2002, 40). These roots are to be found in the life of a community, and active participation in such a community – be it national, biological, or any other – ensures an individual’s continuity both with the past and the future (Weil 2002, 7). Writing at the height of the Second World War and shortly before her death, Weil recognized the rootedness of community as both stable and dynamic, diagnosing uprootedness as a social affliction brought on by the violences of war and colonialism, but also more subversively in modern capitalism and the dogmatic pursuit of economic gain (2002, 41).
Although unlikely bedfellows, Weil’s discussion of uprootedness and social malaise touches on the notions of social psychiatry outlined by German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin in 1921.1 In “On Uprootedness”, Kraepelin suggests that ‘humans are animals of the herd’ (Engstrom and Weber 2010, 346), or, in other words, that an individual’s psychosocial development depends upon ‘the relationships to their human surroundings’ (Engstrom and Weber 2010, 346). Alluding to the nature-nurture debate, Kraepelin suggests that while biological inheritance provides certain predispositions in the development of personality, the social environment of the developing individual may influence their mental health both positively and negatively. The most destructive influence – uprootedness – was ‘brought on by the dissolution of family ties’ (Engstrom and Weber 2010, 346), although it may also arise from the disruption of community more generally – marital, national, linguistic, or religious (Engstrom and Weber 2010, 348–50). Mental illness, in other words, has both somatic and social roots.